Search for: "California Water Impact Network"
Results 1 - 20
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2009, 2:40 pm
I have an interview about the delta smelt with Carolee Krieger of the California Water Impact Network in the first hour today. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
AbbottIn the opinion of the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, (California Water Impact Network v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:17 pm
”Hydraulic fracturing is increasing competitive pressures for water in some of the country’s most water-stressed and drought-ridden regions,” said Mindy Lubber, president of the Ceres green investors’ network. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 11:40 am
California made a commitment to deliver high quality and affordable service to all. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:55 am
They will make an immediate impact on groundwater management in California. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:31 pm
On June 3, 2015, environmental groups, including the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, California Water Impact Network, AquAlliance, and Restore the Delta, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:55 am
They will make an immediate impact on groundwater management in California. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:45 pm
Finally, the Court turned to petitioner’s argument that the case was analogous to Pesticide Action Network North America v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has an air sampling network with historical data available on its website. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
Among other things, the plaintiffs charged that the Corps had arbitrarily and capriciously restricted its NEPA analysis to the projects' impacts on jurisdictional waters. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:03 am
After the trial court disagreed, finding the ordinance only required review of technical standards, the Fifth District Court of Appeal overturned the trial court, finding Standard 8.A necessitates the County’s subjective judgment.[3] However, just two months prior, the Second District Court of Appeal reached a contrary conclusion in California Water Impact Network v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:28 pm
The Planning and Conservation League (“PCL”) and the California Water Impact Network (“CWIN”) (together, “Appellants”) filed petitions challenging the sufficiency of the 2004 EIR. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:51 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California (San Francisco Division). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
NBR had omitted that portion of the road network precisely to avoid significantly impacting areas its consultant had advised “would be considered [ESHA]” under both the City’s CLUP and the Coastal Act; it had noted “impacts to ESHA are prohibited [by the] … Act except for certain allowable uses, and the proposed connectors would be problematic to the … Coastal Commission. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
Still in its seedling phase, Nourish estimates that it will grow to impact over 1 million children. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:36 pm
Topics covered on this blog will include water rights, high speed rail in California, agriculture, the wine industry, water quality, food processing and timber law. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:00 am
This reflects investment efforts in fibre and 5G networks. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
Specifically, the court found that DPR failed to include a checklist or other documentation with meaningful analysis explaining how DPR reached its conclusion that the approval of the proposed label changes would not cause a significant adverse impact to human health, flora, fauna, water, and air. [read post]
